Hood v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Robin Hood |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administrative Record |
2:2019cv02529 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
David C Norton |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 09/11/2019.(cpeg, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Robin Hood. Response to Motion due by 9/23/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(cpeg, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service Due by 12/09/2019. (cpeg, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Robin Hood. Service due by 12/9/2019 (cpeg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.