Joshi et al v. Cuccinelli
Jigarkumar Natvarlal Joshi, P JJ and Poonam Jigarkumar Joshi |
Kenneth Cuccinelli |
2:2020cv01588 |
April 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of South Carolina by Poonam Jigarkumar Joshi, Jigarkumar Natvarlal Joshi, P JJ(Younger daughter, minor under 18 years old), P JJ(Older daughter, minor under 18 years old). Kenneth Cuccinelli served on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Proof of Service)(Banias, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued (as to USA) Kenneth Cuccinelli. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Clerk refiled corrected event as to USA) (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by P JJ(Younger daughter, minor under 18 years old), P JJ(Older daughter, minor under 18 years old), Jigarkumar Natvarlal Joshi, Poonam Jigarkumar Joshi.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenneth Cuccinelli ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9068040.), filed by Poonam Jigarkumar Joshi, Jigarkumar Natvarlal Joshi, P JJ(Younger daughter, minor under 18 years old), P JJ(Older daughter, minor under 18 years old). Service due by 7/22/2020(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.