Glidden v. Smith et al
| Brian L Glidden |
| Ted Smith and Scarlett Wilson |
| 2:2020cv02506 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Proper Form Order with required documents, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Brian L Glidden, 0001594211, Al Cannon Detention Center, 3841 Leeds Avenue, North Charleston, SC 29405. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 7
REFERENCE #6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 08/19/2020.(hada, )
|
|
Filing 6
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 9/9/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 08/19/2020. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 3
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Brian L Glidden. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Ted Smith, Scarlett Wilson, filed by Brian L Glidden. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(hada, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
