Williams v. Maersk Sheerness et al
Miguel Williams |
Maersk A/S Co, Maersk Sheerness, Zeaborn Ship Management GmbH & Cie KG and Tongxing International Ship Lease Co Ltd |
2:2021cv00867 |
March 25, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 REPLY by Miguel Williams . (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(Bilbrey, Albert) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Miguel Williams. Tongxing International Ship Lease Co Ltd waiver executed on 4/12/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Bilbrey, Albert) (Main Document 6 replaced on 4/15/2021) (jbry, ). Modified on 4/15/2021 to replace document with corrected signature as provided by filing user (jbry, ). |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Miguel Williams. Maersk A/S Co waiver executed on 4/12/2021, answer due 6/11/2021. (Bilbrey, Albert) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/15/2021) (jbry, ). Modified on 4/15/2021 to replace document with corrected signature as provided by filing user (jbry, ). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jbry, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Miguel Williams.(jbry, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9731149.), filed by Miguel Williams. Service due by 6/23/2021(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.