Johnson v. Robert Bosch, LLC
| Kelvin M Johnson |
| Robert Bosch, LLC |
| 2:2021cv03661 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Motion of Matthew Hood to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert Bosch, LLC. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/3/2022.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Motion of Andrew Stuart to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert Bosch, LLC. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/3/2022.(sshe, )
|
| Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. Magistrate Judge Molly H. Cherry no longer assigned to the case. (bshr, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Matthew Hood (Unopposed) ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10242359) by Robert Bosch, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Shoun, Cheryl) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew Stuart (Unopposed) ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10242336) by Robert Bosch, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pro Hac Vice Application, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Pro Hac Vice Application, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Shoun, Cheryl) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Cheryl D Shoun on behalf of Robert Bosch, LLC (Shoun, Cheryl) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kelvin M Johnson. Robert Bosch, LLC served on 11/23/2021, answer due 12/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Wigger, Jarrel) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Robert Bosch, LLC. Service due by 2/7/2022 (cpeg, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kelvin M Johnson.(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert Bosch, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10174403.), filed by Kelvin M Johnson. Service due by 2/7/2022(cpeg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Robert Bosch, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelvin M Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Jarrel L Wigger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Bosch, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Holmes Stuart |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D Shoun |
| Represented By: | Matthew Alexander Hood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
