Anderson v. Nason Care LLC et al
Wendy Anderson |
Nason Care LLC and Barron S. Nason |
2:2021cv04132 |
December 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Barron S. Nason, Nason Care LLC.(Cobb, Hal) (Main Document 7 replaced on 2/14/2022) (sshe, ). Modified on 2/14/2022 to replace with corrected signature document as provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Barron S. Nason, Nason Care LLC.(Cobb, Hal) (Main Document 6 replaced on 2/14/2022) (sshe, ). Modified on 2/14/2022 to replace with corrected signature document as provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Wendy Anderson. Service due by 4/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join) (Mullaney, Marybeth) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Barron S. Nason, Nason Care LLC. (hcor, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wendy Anderson.(hcor, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barron S. Nason, Nason Care LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10251102.), filed by Wendy Anderson. Service due by 3/22/2022(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.