Rogers v. Greenville County Detention Center et al
Quincey Rogers |
Greenville County Detention Center, Mr. Vandermoss and Mr. Hollister |
2:2022cv00078 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Richard M Gergel |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 6 Order, #5 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Quincey Rogers 245342 Greenville County Detention Center Greenville, SC 29601. (dgar) |
Filing 6 REFERENCE ORDER: The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 1/28/2022. (dgar) |
Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 1/28/2022. (dgar) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Quincey Rogers. Response to Motion due by 1/25/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greenville County Detention Center, Mr. Hollister, Mr. Vandermoss, filed by Quincey Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.