Serrano v. Goose Creek Police Department et al
Erica C. Serrano |
City of Goose Creek, Goose Creek Police Department, Conway Police Department, South Carolina Department of Social Services, The and City of Conway |
2:2024cv03369 |
June 5, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
David C Norton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 18 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Erica C. Serrano.(King, Matthew) |
Filing 17 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Conway, City of Goose Creek, Conway Police Department, Goose Creek Police Department, South Carolina Department of Social Services, The.(Butler, Drew) |
Filing 16 Rule 26(f) Report by City of Goose Creek. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Butler, Drew) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Erica C. Serrano. Response to Motion due by 7/17/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(King, Matthew) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Erica C. Serrano.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/10/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (King, Matthew) |
Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Conway, Conway Police Department. Response to Motion due by 7/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Thomas, Lisa) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Conway, Conway Police Department.(Thomas, Lisa) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Conway, Conway Police Department.(Thomas, Lisa) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Erica C. Serrano.(King, Matthew) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Erica C. Serrano.Reply to Response to Motion due by 6/27/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (King, Matthew) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Department of Social Services, The.(Ganes, Elloree) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by South Carolina Department of Social Services, The.(Ganes, Elloree) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Goose Creek, Goose Creek Police Department. Response to Motion due by 6/20/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Butler, Drew) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Goose Creek.(Butler, Drew) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Goose Creek, Goose Creek Police Department.(dgar) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas for the County of Berkeley, case number 2024-CP-08-00750. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11807216), filed by Goose Creek Police Department, City of Goose Creek. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.