Glover v. University Motor Company
| 3:2008cv02254 |
| June 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Bristow Marchant |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 47 Report and Recommendations, dismissing the action with prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) and finding as moot 38 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 01/15/10. (bshr, )
|
|
Filing
47
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). Alternatively, IT IS RECOMMENDED that defendant's motion to dismiss be granted, re 38 First MOTION to Dismiss with attachments filed by University Motor Company, Objections to R&R due by 1/8/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey on December 22, 2009. (kbos)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER RULING ON 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS referring the action back to Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 09/11/08. (bshr, )(bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Glover v. University Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
