McCoy v. City of Columbia et al
| Jonathan David McCoy |
| City of Columbia, Columbia Police Department, City of, John K Passmore, James Heywood and Amanda H Long |
| 3:2010cv00132 |
| January 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Joseph R McCrorey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting in part, defendants' motion to dismiss, defendant CPD is dismissed as a party and against the individual defendants in their official capacities, denying the motion t o strike, for 52 Report and Recommendations, Columbia Police Department, City of terminated., Motion granted in part, denied in part: 36 MOTION to Dismiss and/or to strike Amended Complaint filed by Columbia Police Department, City of, City of Columbia. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on March 11, 2011. (kbos)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting in part 31 Report and Recommendations; finding as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss/for More Definite Statement/to Strike; finding as moot 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 08/31/2010. (bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
