Purnell v. State of South Carolina
Petitioner: Kim Purnell
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Case Number: 3:2011cv02593
Filed: September 29, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, dismissing the petition without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. FURTHER ORDERED a certificate of appealability is denied and petitioner's motion to stay is denied, for 11 Motion to Stay filed by Kim Purnell, 8 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on November 8, 2011. (kbos)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Purnell v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kim Purnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?