Ballington v. Internal Revenue Service

Plaintiff: Michelle Elizabeth Ballington
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 3:2012cv01604
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Columbia Office
County: Lexington
Referring Judge: Paige J Gossett
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2014 55 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 49 Report and Recommendation; denying as moot 44 Motion for Hearing by Michelle Elizabeth Ballington; granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment by Internal Revenue Service Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 3/18/14.(mflo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ballington v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Elizabeth Ballington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.