Brewer v. Dynamic Recovery Services Inc
Plaintiff: John Brewer
Defendant: Dynamic Recovery Services Inc
Case Number: 3:2013cv00286
Filed: January 31, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Lexington
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER re: Defendant Assets, notifying parties the court will refrain from issuing a ruling at this time regarding the existence and identity of assets which may be used to satisfy the judgment and ordering 1. Defendant to turn over to Plaintiff's counsel all QuickBooks files within (10) days and 2. directing Defendant to refrain from alienating any of Defendant's assets except as necessary in the ordinary course of operating Defendant's debt collection business. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 03/09/2015. (bshr, )
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER staying 90 , 93 Order and Amended Order Holding Defendant in Contempt and Requiring the U.S. Marshal to Assume Custody of J.D. Shade, reinstating 77 Order granting Motion to Bring Corporate Judgment Debtor's Pr esident Before the Court to Be Examined to Identify Assets to Satisfy the Judgment, vacating 96 Warrant Issued for Arrest of J.D. Shade, and directing all parties, including Mr. Shade as corporate representative, to appear before the Court for a hearing in Courtroom IV of the Matthew J. Perry Jr. Federal Courthouse, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 18, 2015. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 01/29/2015. (bshr, )
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 AMENDED ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT AND REQUIRING THE U.S. MARSHAL TO ASSUME CUSTODY OF J.D. SHADE directing the United States Marshal to seize and detain J.D. Shade, President of Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc., and transport him to the District of South Carolina so that he may appear before this Court to explain why he should not be sanctioned for his contempt. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 01/22/2015. (bshr, )
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT AND REQUIRING THE U.S. MARSHAL TO ASSUME CUSTODY OF J.D. SHADE directing the United States Marshal to seize and detain J.D. Shade, President of Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc., and transport him to the District of South Carolina so that he may appear before this Court to explain why he should not be sanctioned for his contempt. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 01/20/2015. (bshr, )
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER granting 76 Motion to Bring Corporate Judgment Debtor's President Before the Court to Be Examined to Identify Assets to Satisfy the Judgment, directing J.S. Shade, President of Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc., to appear before this court in Courtroom No. IV of the Matthew J. Perry, Jr. Federal Courthouse, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, November 24, 2014, for the purpose of answering questions, under oath, regarding assets of Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc. that may be used to satisfy the judgment in this case. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 10/09/2014.(bshr, )
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting 71 Motion to Bring Third Party Payment Companies before the Court to Identify Assets of Judgment Debtor and Apply the Assets to the Outstanding Judgment, notifying parties a hearing will be held 11/24/2014 fo r Western Union Financial and Money Gram Payment Systems, Inc. to testify as to the amount of money each has received and/or owes or is otherwise obligated to remit to the Defendant, Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc., up to the amount of the $30,000 judgment obtained by the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 09/25/2014.(bshr, )
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER directing the Clerk to enter a default judgment against Defendant in the amount of $5,000 in actual and statutory damages to Plaintiff for his harassment claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq., plus $25,000 in attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 06/20/2014. (bshr, )
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 35 Motion to Compel Depositions, directing the defendant, Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc., to produce within 15 days of the date of this order the witnesses identified in the plaintiff's Notice of Deposition. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 04/08/2014.(bshr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brewer v. Dynamic Recovery Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Brewer
Represented By: David Andrew Maxfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dynamic Recovery Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?