Heslin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Store #0001525 et al

Plaintiff: Edward Heslin
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. Store #0001525 and Schindler Elevator Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv00517
Filed: February 27, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heslin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Store #0001525 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Heslin
Represented By: Patrick M Killen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. Store #0001525
Represented By: Jay Thomas Thompson
Represented By: Timothy Michael McKissock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Represented By: Jay Thomas Thompson
Represented By: Timothy Michael McKissock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?