Purvis v. Lutheran Hospice et al
| Mary Cathy Purvis |
| Lutheran Hospice and Lutheran Homes of South Carolina, The |
| 3:2015cv02238 |
| June 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Lexington |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part Defendant The Lutheran Homes of South Carolina, Inc.s Motion to Amend 30 the March 30, 2017 Order and summarily DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, breach of contract/detrimental reliance and bad faith failure to pay insurance. All remaining aspects of Defendant's Motion are DENIED. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/5/2018.(asni, ) Modified to edit text on 3/5/2018 (asni, ).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ACCEPTING IN PART 24 Report and Recommendation, granting in part denying in part 17 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/30/2017. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
14
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER This Order shall take effect when entered and shall be binding upon: (1) counsel who signed below and their respective law firms; and (2) their respective clients. Motions granted: 13 Joint MOTION for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 9/28/2015. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
