Scott v. Chrome Capital LLC

Scott v. Chrome Capital LLC

Plaintiff:	Maurice Wyman Scott
Defendant:	Chrome Capital LLC
Case Number:	3:2015cv02692
Filed:	July 7, 2015
Court:	U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Richland
Presiding Judge:	Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge:	Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit:	Truth in Lending
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 22, 2016	Filing 43 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts 38 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 21 motion to dismiss, converted into one for summary judgment, is granted. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 8/22/2016. (cbru, )
May 10, 2016	Filing 29 ORDER: Assuming service of process is effected or waived, the court plans to treat Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) as one for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 pursuant to Fed. R . Civ. P. 12(d), because matters outside of the pleadings have been presented. The parties are permitted until two weeks following the resolution of service issues to present any material pertinent to the motion that has not previously been submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 5/10/2016. (mwal)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 22, 2016

Filing 43 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts 38 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 21 motion to dismiss, converted into one for summary judgment, is granted. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 8/22/2016. (cbru, )

May 10, 2016

Filing 29 ORDER: Assuming service of process is effected or waived, the court plans to treat Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) as one for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 pursuant to Fed. R . Civ. P. 12(d), because matters outside of the pleadings have been presented. The parties are permitted until two weeks following the resolution of service issues to present any material pertinent to the motion that has not previously been submitted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 5/10/2016. (mwal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Chrome Capital LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Wyman Scott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Chrome Capital LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?