Odom et al v. City of Columbia Police Department
| Wynter Odom, Stacy Case and Kimberly Wise-Lewis |
| City of Columbia Police Department |
| 3:2015cv04313 |
| October 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING THE 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 22 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Proposed Joint Consent Amended Scheduling Order due by 7/17/2017) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/11/2017. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Case's claims without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/10/2016. (mwal) Modified to edit text on 8/11/2016 (mwal).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER instructing Plaintiff's counsel to serve a copy of its Suggestion of Death [ECF No. 8] and this order, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, on any known personal representative of Case and to file proof of said service by December 4, 2015. If no party files a motion for substitution within 90 days from the service of the personal representative, Cases action will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 11/20/2015. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
