Tate v. State et al
| Phyllis Tate |
| State, Department of Public Safety, Officer Colbert, Lakisha Martin, Richland County Sheriff Department and Myers Beryl Lyennett |
| 3:2016cv02715 |
| August 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER concurring in the 59 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the complaint as to Defendant Colbert with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable Margaret B. Seymour on 7/10/2018. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER directing Plaintiff to advise the court whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendant's 53 MOTION to Dismiss by June 7, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 5/24/2018. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER concurring and incorporating 41 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the Complaint as to Defendants Martin and Myers without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 1/9/2018. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER concurring in the 14 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable Margaret B. Seymour on 11/8/2016. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
