Lewis v. Richland County Recreation Commission et al
Taurus Lewis |
Richland County Recreation Commission, James Brown, III, David Stringer and Tara Dickerson |
3:2016cv02884 |
August 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Richland |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Thomas E Rogers |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER denying 57 Motion to Compel.(dsto, ) |
Filing 91 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court overrules all of the parties' objections, except Lewis's objection concerning his race discrimination claim, adopts the Report 83 to the extent it does not contr adict this Order, and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court, Lewis's Motion for Summary Judgment 47 is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 46 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants' Motion is denied as to Lewis's race, retaliation, and defamation claims, and granted as to his FMLA and civil conspiracy claims. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 09/05/2018. (dsto, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report 18 and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Defendants' motion to dismiss 5 is DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/22/2016. (dsto, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.