Garner v. Brown
Plaintiff: Kantwan Kinte Garner
Defendant: Marcus Brown
Case Number: 3:2017cv01268
Filed: May 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Referring Judge: Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2017 Filing 16 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #15 Judgment and #14 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation placed in U.S. Mail to Kantwan Kinte Garner. (bgoo)
July 18, 2017 Filing 15 JUDGMENT dismissing the action without prejudice. (bgoo)
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting the #9 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the action without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 7/18/2017. (bgoo)
July 10, 2017 Filing 13 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Kantwan Kinte Garner and Notice of Address Change. Reply to Objections due by 7/24/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bgoo)
June 29, 2017 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENTS RE-MAILED #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #8 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Kantwan Kinte Garner at the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, 201 John Mark Dial Dr., Columbia, SC 29209. (bgoo)
June 14, 2017 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #8 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Kantwan Kinte Garner. (bgoo)
June 14, 2017 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the #1 Complaint be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/13/2017. (bgoo)
June 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Motion granted: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/13/2017. (bgoo)
May 17, 2017 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kantwan Kinte Garner. (bgoo)
May 17, 2017 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kantwan Kinte Garner. Response to Motion due by 5/31/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (bgoo)
May 17, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marcus Brown, filed by Kantwan Kinte Garner. (bgoo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garner v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcus Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kantwan Kinte Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?