Caraboolad v. Sun Tan City LLC
| Ryan Caraboolad |
| Sun Tan City LLC |
| 3:2018cv02699 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ryan Caraboolad (Nettles, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sun Tan City LLC.(Williams, Blake) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss , or in the Alternative, MOTION to Transfer or MOTION to Stay this Case and Memorandum in Support by Sun Tan City LLC. Response to Motion due by 12/3/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Stephen C. Greenlaw, #2 Exhibit B - Goodman Action Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Goodman Action Dkt. Sheet)No proposed order.(Williams, Blake). Added MOTION to Transfer Case, MOTION to Stay on 11/19/2018 (asni, ). |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 11/1/2018.(asni, ) |
| Filing 7 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Sun Tan City LLC answer due 11/19/2018. (Barnwell, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Stefan Coleman ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-8044893) by Ryan Caraboolad. Response to Motion due by 10/24/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Supporting Documents)No proposed order.(Nettles, Christopher) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/1/2018: #2 Certificate of Good Standing Supreme Court) (asni, ). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ryan Caraboolad. Registered Agent Ryan Caraboolad served on 10/4/2018, answer due 10/25/2018. (Nettles, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ryan Caraboolad.(asni, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Sun Tan City LLC. (asni, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sun Tan City LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8035893.), filed by Ryan Caraboolad. Service due by 1/2/2019(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caraboolad v. Sun Tan City LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sun Tan City LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian Montgomery Barnwell |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Rush Smith, III |
| Represented By: | Blake Terence Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ryan Caraboolad | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Tyson Nettles |
| Represented By: | Stefan Louis Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
