Palmetto State Armory LLC v. Huff et al
| Palmetto State Armory LLC |
| Destructive Devices Industries LLC, Leonard Scott Huff and David Fillers |
| 3:2019cv00072 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Palmetto State Armory LLC. Destructive Devices Industries LLC served on 2/6/2019, answer due 2/27/2019. (asni, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Palmetto State Armory LLC. David Fillers served on 2/2/2019, answer due 2/25/2019. (asni, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Palmetto State Armory LLC. Leonard Scott Huff served on 2/19/2019, answer due 3/12/2019. (asni, ) |
| Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Palmetto State Armory LLC.(asni, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Destructive Devices Industries LLC. (asni, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Fillers. (asni, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Leonard Scott Huff. (asni, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD as to All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400. Receipt number 0420-8201876.), filed by Palmetto State Armory LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Final Arbitration Award, #2 Exhibit B - DDI Operating Agreement)(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
