Mullendore v. U.S. Bank National Association
William H. Mullendore |
U.S. Bank National Association |
3:2020cv03930 |
November 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Cameron McGowan Currie |
Other Statutory Actions |
12 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 13. Reason: Document should not have been filed pursuant to Rule 5(d) FRCivP. (cbru, ) |
Filing 12 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 1/13/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/10/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/7/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/5/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/5/2021, Discovery due by 6/30/2021, Motion in Limine due by 11/15/2021, Motions due by 7/14/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/22/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 12/6/2021, ADR Statement due by 8/11/2021, Mediation Due by 9/8/2021. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/9/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. Bank National Association.(Kelchner, John) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by William H. Mullendore.(Porter, Stephen) |
Filing 9 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER U.S. Bank National Association answer due 12/9/2020. (Kelchner, John) |
Filing 8 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Richland County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Richland County Public Index)(Kelchner, John) |
Filing 7 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by U.S. Bank National Association.(Kelchner, John) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Defendant's response to Local Civil Rule Interrogatory 26.01(C) filed as ECF No. #3 is incomplete. This party is directed to file a complete response to all subparts of the inquiry within three business days of entry of this order. (Supplement due by 11/17/2020) Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 11/12/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by U.S. Bank National Association. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by U.S. Bank National Association.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-40-04817 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9465135) filed by U.S. Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mullendore v. U.S. Bank National Association | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association | |
Represented By: | John B Kelchner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William H. Mullendore | |
Represented By: | Kevin Desmond Maroney |
Represented By: | Stephen D Porter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.