Childs v. Rollins, Inc.
| William Childs |
| Rollins, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv02731 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to William Childs, PO Box 9691, Columbia, SC 29290, (lbak) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district court dismiss this action with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/4/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/20/2021. (lbak) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, Form USM-285, #8 Order and Notice, standard complaint form and 9 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to William Childs, PO Box 9691, Columbia, SC 29290. (lbak) |
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/25/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by September 15, 2021, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district judge that the claims be dismissed without leave for further amendment. (Specific Document due by 9/15/2021.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/25/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 7
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 9/15/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/25/2021. (lbak)
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by William Childs. (lbak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by William Childs. Response to Motion due by 9/7/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rollins, Inc., filed by William Childs. (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Childs v. Rollins, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Childs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rollins, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
