Smith v. Amazon Publishing
Plaintiff: Moses Smith
Defendant: Amazon Publishing and Amazon inc
Case Number: 3:2022cv03406
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Referring Judge: Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2022 Filing 14 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Moses Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist)
November 28, 2022 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amazon inc, filed by Moses Smith. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dist)
November 8, 2022 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order, 9 Clerk's Notice, #8 Proper Form Order, 26.01 form, blank summons, blank USM-285 forms placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Moses Smith, 3900 Bentley Road, Suite 915, Columbia, SC 29210. (dist)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered (plus three days for mail time) to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) that corrects the deficiencies identified in this order. (Specific Document due by 11/29/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 11/7/2022. (dist)
November 8, 2022 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #8 . (dist)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 11/29/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 11/7/2022. (dist)
October 3, 2022 Filing 4 NON-STANDARD ITEM RECEIVED: 5 books from Moses Smith re: #1 Complaint (dist) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2022: #1 Priority Mail Box) (dist, ).
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Moses Smith. Response to Motion due by 10/17/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2022: #1 Priority Mail Box) (dist)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon Publishing, filed by Moses Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents)(dist) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/5/2022: #3 Priority Mail Box) (dist).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Amazon Publishing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Moses Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon Publishing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?