Coxe v. Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins Co, et al
Jonathan E. Coxe |
Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins. Co., Jason Lowe, Insure4Life, Inc and Alliance Group, LLC |
3:2023cv00389 |
January 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Sherri A Lydon |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Separate ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and, COUNTERCLAIM against Jonathan E. Coxe by Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins. Co.. (Willard, Theodore) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins. Co.. Response to Motion due by 2/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Willard, Theodore) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins. Co.(ahil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lexington County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-32-04386. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10916373), filed by Government Personnel Mutual Life Ins. Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Documents, LCCP 2022CP3204686, #2 Exhibit B GPM life Policy)(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.