Hathaway v. Owens
Petitioner: Barry Hathaway
Respondent: John R Owens
Case Number: 4:2008cv00491
Filed: February 13, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Williamsburg
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendation. The case is hereby remanded to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of the "Response" of the petitioner and preparation of a Report and Recommendation regarding the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 12/22/08. (swel, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hathaway v. Owens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Barry Hathaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John R Owens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?