Frilando v. Owen
Petitioner: John Anthony Frilando
Respondent: John R Owen
Case Number: 4:2008cv03532
Filed: October 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Williamsburg
Presiding Judge: C Weston Houck
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Anthony Frilando be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondents to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 12/29/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/10/08. (swel, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frilando v. Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Anthony Frilando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John R Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?