Sono Irish Inc v. Town of Surfside Beach et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 21, 2015
ORDER: The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' [ECF## 64 , 65 , 66 , and 72 ] motions for summary judgment. Specifically, the Court grants Defendants' motions for summary judgment as to all federa l claims including the claims for denial of equal protection, substantive due process, procedural due process, tortious interference with contractual relations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and civil conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Plaintiff's attempt to assert a First Amendment retaliation claim fails as the claim was not pled in the complaint and cannot be asserted at this late date. The Court denies the motions for summary judgment as to any state law claims and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims for tortious interference with prospective contractual relations and civil conspiracy. The remaining state law claims for tortious interference with prospective contractual relations and civil conspiracy are hereby REMANDED to the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas for Horry County, South Carolina. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 5/21/2015. (hcic, )
|October 7, 2014
ORDER denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/7/2014. (hcic, )
|November 25, 2013
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by the Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 11/25/2013. (hcic)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?