Howell v. Holland et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 23, 2015
ORDER adopting 92 Report and Recommendation; Defendant McLeod's 55 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's failure to accommodate and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Plaintiff's 57 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's failure to accommodate and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. P ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims against McLeod and Dr. Holland. Because this Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, the Cour t does not make any findings with respect to the state law claims and declines to rule on either Defendant Holland's 56 motion for summary judgment or Plaintiff's 57 motion for summary judgment to the extent it pertains to Plaintiff 9;s state law claims against McLeod and Dr. Holland. The remaining state law claims in this case against McLeod and Dr. Holland are hereby REMANDED to the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Florence County,where this case was originally filed. Signed by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell on 2/23/2015. (hcic, )
|March 10, 2014
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 03/10/2014.(dsto, )
|June 13, 2013
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/13/2013.(dsto, )
|May 17, 2013
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation 22 of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated by reference. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant McLeods motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7 ) be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh causes of action be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 05/17/2013. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?