Gilchrist v. Edwardson et al
| Alfred Gilchrist |
| Neal Ross, James Lee, Willie B Edwardson and Mark K Richardson |
| 4:2013cv03512 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Marion |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT, by the Clerk. This case is dismissed without prejudice. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/09/2014. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Upon consideration Plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. 16 and 17 ) are GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court respectfully declines to follow the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recomme ndation 12 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before February 21, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall return this matter to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 1/10/2014. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/20/2013. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
