Howell v. State of South Carolina
Petitioner: Frederick L Howell
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Case Number: 4:2014cv03869
Filed: October 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Orangeburg
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS in full the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19 ) as the order of this Court. Accordingly, Petitioner's habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/16/2015. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howell v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Frederick L Howell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?