Deutsch Bank National Trust Company v. Brader et al
| Deutsch Bank National Trust Company |
| Todd Brader and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc |
| 4:2015cv00600 |
| February 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Horry |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Bank's motion to remand [ECF No. 22 ] is GRANTED, that Brader's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 35 ] is DENIED AS MOOT, and that this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for Horry County, South Carolina, for further proceedings. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of this Court to mail a certified copy of this order of remand to the Clerk of Court for the Horry County Court of Common Pleas. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 1/20/2016. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER: Plaintiff filed a Motion for Remand, setting forth several legal reasons the matter should be remanded. ECF No. 22 . Defendant has the right to submit a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Any such response must be provided to the court no later than May 11, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/6/2015. (mcot, ) Modified on 4/6/2015 to replace main document with corrected document (mcot, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
