Rosendall et al v. Voigt et al
||Hillery Rosendall, Tocara Smith, Shameka Haynesworth and Mokeia Hammond
||Herman Voigt and South Carolina Department of Corrections
||March 29, 2017
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||Bruce Howe Hendricks
||Thomas E Rogers
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1446
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 7, 2018
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates the Magistrate's Report 36 . Voigt's Motion to Dismiss, Partial Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to strike 36 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set out. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 05/07/2018. (dsto, )
|May 1, 2017
ORDER: Plaintiffs shall have ten days from the date of this order to file their amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to note Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document # 5 ) as withdrawn in accordance with the agreement of the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/01/2017. (dsto, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?