Rosendall et al v. Voigt et al
Plaintiff: Hillery Rosendall, Tocara Smith, Shameka Haynesworth and Mokeia Hammond
Defendant: Herman Voigt and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Case Number: 4:2017cv00821
Filed: March 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates the Magistrate's Report 36 . Voigt's Motion to Dismiss, Partial Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to strike 36 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set out. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 05/07/2018. (dsto, )
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiffs shall have ten days from the date of this order to file their amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to note Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document # 5 ) as withdrawn in accordance with the agreement of the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/01/2017. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosendall et al v. Voigt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hillery Rosendall
Represented By: James Edward Bell, III
Represented By: Aaron Cole Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tocara Smith
Represented By: James Edward Bell, III
Represented By: Aaron Cole Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shameka Haynesworth
Represented By: James Edward Bell, III
Represented By: Aaron Cole Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mokeia Hammond
Represented By: James Edward Bell, III
Represented By: Aaron Cole Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Herman Voigt
Represented By: Claude E Hardin, Jr
Represented By: Daniel R Settana, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections
Represented By: Damon C Wlodarczyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?