Black v. Masano
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 14, 2018
ORDER: Defendant has ten (10) days from the date of this order to file a Suggestion of Death with the Court pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant must also file a certificate of service showing that the Suggestion of Death has been served upon the non-party representative of the deceased pursuant to the Rules.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/14/2018. (dsto, )
|August 13, 2018
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/13/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to File Objections)(dsto, )
|January 9, 2018
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the Report (ECF No. 8 ), which is incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, the case is PARTIALLY SUMMARILY DISMISSED without prejudice as to the claims of fa lse arrest, malicious prosecution, and deprivation of property. The Plaintiff's case may proceed on the claim of deliberate indifference to medical care. The court authorized issuance and service of process on Defendant solely on the claim of deliberate indifference of medical care. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 01/09/2018. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?