Wolfe v. Rynolds et al
| Michael E. Wolfe |
| Nfn Rynolds, Nfn Sharp, Nfn Rogers, Nfn McCullough, Nfn Richardson, Nfn Gregg, Nfn O'Neal, Nfn Moore, Nfn Moses, Phoebee Sharpe, Rosa Privette, Nfn Clark, Nfn Mack, Nfn Briteheart, Nfn Grant, Nfn Kline, Nfn Kinerly and Jamie Rice |
| 4:2018cv01350 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Lee |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
520
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report (ECF # 512 ) and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Lieber Defendants to include Defendants Clark, Mack, Brighth arp, Grant, Kline, Kinnery, Rice, and Williams' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and therefore, Plaintiff's claims against them are dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Lee Defendants Reynolds, Sharp, O'Neal, Sharpe, Delp, Smit h, and Hastie AND Defendant Richardson's Motions for Summary Judgment are granted; and therefore, Plaintiff's claims against them are dismissed. AND IT IS ORDERED that Lee Defendants McCullough, Gregg, Moore, Moses, Rogers, and Privette's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 08/05/2021. (dsto, ) (Main Document 520 replaced on 8/5/2021 to correct scrivener's error per chambers) (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
456
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL: The court appoints Henry P. Wall, Esquire, to represent Plaintiff in this action. The outstanding motions filed in this case are deemed moot. The court will enter a new scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/20/2019. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
402
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 339 ), and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 250 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 7/19/2019. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
345
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 297 ) and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 267 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 6/7/2019. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
277
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 240 ) and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions for Preliminary Injunction (ECF Nos. 184 and 218 ) are DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 04/30/2019. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
263
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 107 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 108 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in pa rt 110 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 111 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 149 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 150 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 151 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 186 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 187 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part [ 188] Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 230 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 231 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 232 Motion to Compel; denying 94 Motion to Compel and 95 Motion to Compel. However, Plaintiff may re-file these two motions (#94 and #95) within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 04/19/2019.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 102 ) and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 79 ) and renewed motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 163 ).IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 01/18/2019. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER: Defendants are directed to file an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint 101 or otherwise plead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/14/2018. (dsto)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After a thorough review of the record in this case, the Court finds no clear error and therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R (ECF No. 60 ). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Defendants Nfn. Kline and Nfn. ONeal without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This action remains pending as to the other named defendants.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/17/2018. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; granting 40 Motion to Amend Complaint; granting in part and deny ing in part 43 Motion for Information for Service. To the extent the served Defendants have knowledge of proper addresses in which to personally serve Defendants Kline, ONeal, Richardson, Rogers, and Delp, the court orders Defendants, who have ent ered an appearance, to file under seal said addresses with the court within 15 days of this Order. Counsel for Defendants whom have been served are further directed to inform the court and Plaintiff within 10 days of the date of this order if they will accept service of the Amended Complaint on behalf of any of the following Defendants: Kline, ONeal, Richardson, Rogers, and Delp. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/20/2018.(dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
