Cromwell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Margaret McFadden Cromwell |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record |
| 4:2019cv01049 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 4/10/2019.(gnan )
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service due by 7/9/2019. (gnan ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Margaret McFadden Cromwell. Response to Motion due by 4/24/2019. No proposed order. Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(gnan ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Margaret McFadden Cromwell. Service due by 7/9/2019.(gnan ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
