Geiger et al v. Racing Stables, The
| Jessica Hinton, Masha Lund, Rachel Koren, Brenda Geiger, Claudia Sampedro, Eva Pepaj, Irina Voronina, Jessica Burciaga, Jessa Hinton, Malu Lund, Rachel Bernstein, Sara Underwood, Lena Posada and Katarina Van Derham |
| Racing Stables, The doing business as The Stables Club |
| 4:2021cv03523 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(hcic, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Racing Stables, The. Service due by 1/26/2022 (hcic, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jessica Burciaga, Brenda Geiger, Jessica Hinton, Rachel Koren, Masha Lund, Eva Pepaj, Lena Posada, Claudia Sampedro, Sara Underwood, Katarina Van Derham, Irina Voronina.(hcic, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Racing Stables, The (filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-10148363), filed by Jessica Hinton, Claudia Sampedro, Irina Voronina, Jessica Burciaga, Rachel Koren, Sara Underwood, Masha Lund, Lena Posada, Brenda Geiger, Katarina Van Derham, Eva Pepaj. (Attachments: #1 Photos)(hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
