Morton et al v. McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC et al
| Peggy Morton |
| Ciox Health, LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC and Thomas Trezak, MD |
| 4:2022cv04610 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Peggy Morton (Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Ciox Health, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 16 TEXT ORDER denying #14 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/1/2023. (gray) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Stay Response filed by Ciox Health, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay by Peggy Morton. Response to Motion due by 2/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memo in Support by Ciox Health, LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC, Thomas Trezak, MD. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Supporting Documents Bendheim Declaration ISO Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit 1- Inflation adjustments, #4 Exhibit 2- 2022.08.22 Ltrf Giese to McLeod Regional, #5 Exhibit 3- 2022.08.25 Ciox invoice to Giese for records fr McLeod Regional, #6 Exhibit 4- Ciox eDelivery portal document, #7 Exhibit 5- Ciox eDelivery Enrollment Form, #8 Exhibit 6- 2018.03.29 Ciox eDelivery setup complete)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand by Peggy Morton. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Remand, #2 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.; granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.; granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, adding Andrew McCarty, Gilad Bendheim, and Jay Lefkowitz to Defendant attorney list, respectively. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 01/18/2023. (gray) Added TEXT before ORDER on 1/18/2023 (gray, ). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jay P. Lefkowitz ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10898243) by Ciox Health, LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC, Thomas Trezak, MD. Response to Motion due by 2/1/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Jay P. Lefkowitz)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gilad Y. Bendheim ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10896853) by Ciox Health, LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC, Thomas Trezak, MD. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Gilad Bendheim)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew F. McCarty ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10896594) by Ciox Health, LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center, LLC, Thomas Trezak, MD. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Andrew McCarty)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Peggy Morton.(Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint Ciox Health, LLC answer due 1/19/2023. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 12/27/2022.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Ciox Health, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ciox Health, LLC.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Chesterfield County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP1300836. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10858815), filed by Ciox Health, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - Wells Declaration)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
