Ellis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Wendy Ellis |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
| 4:2024cv03355 |
| June 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER/ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.Plaintiffs Brief due by 9/3/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 13, #2 Part 3 of 13, #3 Part 4 of 13, #4 Part 5 of 13, #5 Part 6 of 13, #6 Part 7 of 13, #7 Part 8 of 13, #8 Part 9 of 13, #9 Part 10 of 13, #10 Part 11 of 13, #11 Part 12 of 13, #12 Part 13 of 13)(Leach, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 6/6/24. (swel, )
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 6/5/24.(swel, )
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Wendy Ellis.. (Sexton, Deondra) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Social Security Appeals Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website.* Not later than thirty days from the entry of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of the Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court Plaintiff withholds consent to disposition of Plaintiff's appeal by a United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing_Order_Regarding_Social_Security_Cases.pdfEntered at the direction of Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on on 6/5/24. (swel, ) |
| Filing 5 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on 8/5/2024 (swel, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Wendy Ellis. Response to Motion due by 6/20/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(swel, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Wendy Ellis.(swel, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
