Cabbagestalk v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
Shaheen Cabbagestalk |
McDonald, Patrick, Poston, Hemphill & Roper LLC, Stuckey Law Offices LLC, Alissa R Collins, James A Stuckey, EH Cooper Trust Fund Head Person of Establishment, William R Byars, SC Dept of Corrections, Susan B Hackett and J Pay Head Person of Establishment |
5:2014cv00032 |
January 6, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Orangeburg Office |
Lee |
Richard M Gergel |
Kaymani D West |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER denying 22 Motion for Reconsideration and ordering this case be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/1/2014.(mcot, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: the Court agrees with and adopts the R&R 11 as the order of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied (Dkt. No. 2 ). Further, Plaintiff shall have until fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order to pay the Court's filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to pay the fee within this fifteen-day period, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/11/2014. (mcot, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 2/24/2014. (mcot, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.