Robinson v. Sharp et al
| Corey Jawan Robinson |
| Kenneth Sharp, Classification McKensey, R Sowell, Clarence Rogers, A Brown, S Patterson, K Gregg, Unit Manager McCullough, Priscilla D Muldrow, Unit Counsel Foster, Unit Counsel McCall, Willie M Godfrey and Classification Department |
| 5:2017cv01011 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Lee |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 108 ) and GRANTS Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Or In The Alternative Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 83 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/28/2018. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27 ) and incorporates it herein. Therefore, the court partially DISMISSES, without prejudice, Pla intiff's Complaint as to his claims regarding 14th Amendment retaliation, 14th Amendment disciplinary action, attempted murder, 14th Amendment job loss, and all claims against the Classification Department (ECF No. 1 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 2/7/2018. (prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
