Hill v. South Carolina Dept of Corr et al
| Tedric Delvion Hill |
| South Carolina Dept of Corr and Lieutenant James S Johnson |
| 5:2018cv01918 |
| July 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Kershaw |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #20 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail to Tedric Delvion Hill, #344029, Kershaw Correctional Institution, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Kershaw, SC 29607. (prou, ) |
Filing 20
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND PARTIALLY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS: After a thorough review of the Report, Plaintiff's letter, and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the #13 Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court the portion of the Complaint seeking damages from SCDC is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Complaint should be served on Lieutenant James S. Johnson. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/4/2018. (prou, )
|
| Filing 17 Letter from Tedric Delvion Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, ) |
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail to Tedric Delvion Hill, #344029, Kershaw Correctional Institution, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Kershaw, SC 29607. (prou, ) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the district court partially dismiss the Complaint in this case without prejudice insofar as it seeks damages from SCDC. The Complaint should be served on Defendant Johnson. Objections to R&R due by 8/17/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 8/3/2018. (prou, ) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to James S Johnson. Service due by 11/1/2018. (prou, ) |
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: 10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 Order 1983 w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail to Tedric Delvion Hill, #344029, Kershaw Correctional Institution, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Kershaw, SC 29607. (prou, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #9 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 8/3/2018.(prou, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 8/3/2018. (prou, )
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (prou, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Tedric Delvion Hill. Response to Motion due by 7/27/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(prou, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James S Johnson, South Carolina Dept of Corr, filed by Tedric Delvion Hill. Service due by 10/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
