Railamerica Inc et al v. Mauldin

Plaintiff: Railamerica Inc and South Carolina Central Railroad Company LLC
Defendant: City of Mauldin
Case Number: 6:2011cv02746
Filed: October 11, 2011
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Greenville Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 49:11503
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Railamerica Inc et al v. Mauldin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Railamerica Inc
Represented By: William Reynolds Williams
Represented By: Mark W Buyck, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: South Carolina Central Railroad Company LLC
Represented By: Mark W Buyck, Jr
Represented By: William Reynolds Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Mauldin
Represented By: John Bagnal Duggan
Represented By: Daniel Roper Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.