Radley v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daphne Radley
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:
6:2013cv00569
Filed:
March 4, 2013
Court:
South Carolina District Court
Office:
Greenville Office
County:
Oconee
Presiding Judge:
Richard M Gergel
Referring Judge:
Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit:
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
July 17, 2014 | 22 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Radley v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daphne Radley | |
Represented By: | Paul Townsend McChesney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.