Landers v. Laurens County Sheriffs Office et al
||Laurens County Sheriffs Office, M R Crain, Jr, Laurens, County of, Rickey Chastain, M Bollman, Robert E Timmons and Sargeant Galazriza
||April 7, 2015
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||G Ross Anderson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 8, 2017
ORDER adopting 95 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. More specifically, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Defendant Lau rens County and Defendant Chastain on all claims, summary judgment is GRANTED to Defendant Laurens County Sheriff's Office on Plaintiff's federal claims, and summary judgment is DENIED as to Defendant Crain and Defendant Timmons on Plaintif f's 1983 claims of false arrest and excessive force. The Court will exercise supplemental jurisdiction as to Plaintiff's state law claims of false arrest and assault and battery as to Defendant Crain and Defendant Timmons, with Defendant Laurens County Sheriff's Office substituted as a governmental entity defendant pursuant to the SCTCA. All other claims under the SCTCA are DISMISSED, as agreed by the parties. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 5/8/2017(gpre, )
|August 10, 2016
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 38 . It is the judgment of the Court that Defendant Sergeant Galazriza is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure of service. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/10/2016. (kric, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?