Knox v. Klimbal et al
Tito Knox |
Elena Klimbal and Officer Graham |
6:2017cv00713 |
March 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Greenville Office |
Greenville |
Paige J Gossett |
Henry M Herlong |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER denying Knox's 42 untimely objections, construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. on 10/30/2017. (bgoo) |
Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 33 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Plaintiff's case with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. on 10/16/2017. (bgoo) |
Filing 29 OPINION & ORDER providing Knox twenty (20) days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint in this case. Further, the case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Amended Complaint due by 9/12/2017. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. on 8/23/2017. (bgoo) |
Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 14 Report and Recommendation and summarily dismissing the complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr. on 5/3/2017. (bgoo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.