Lyles v. Grant et al

Plaintiff: Kenyatte Lyles
Defendant: Anthony Grant, Rotundra Hughley, Jennifer Doe, Candice Makins, Tyanna Hardy and Chandra Grant
Case Number: 6:2017cv03245
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Greenville Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Referring Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18:1964
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 15, 2018 71 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 65 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 39 is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's RICO and Lanham Act claims and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT with respect to Plaintiff's state law claims. The parties are directed to submit additional briefing regarding the amount in controversy within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 10/15/2018.(abuc)
May 16, 2018 62 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts 54 Report and Recommendation, granting 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. This action is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Chandra Grant and Tyanna Hardy. Signed by Honorable A Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr on 5/16/2018. (gpre, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lyles v. Grant et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenyatte Lyles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Grant
Represented By: Quintin J. Lewis
Represented By: Andrew Marshall Rawl
Represented By: Charles Monroe Sprinkle, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rotundra Hughley
Represented By: Quintin J. Lewis
Represented By: Andrew Marshall Rawl
Represented By: Charles Monroe Sprinkle, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Candice Makins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyanna Hardy
Represented By: Darren S Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chandra Grant
Represented By: Darren S Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?