Davis v. Bragg
Defendant: Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Saleem Davis
Case Number: 6:2018cv01349
Filed: May 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Marlboro
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Presiding Judge: A Marvin Quattlebaum
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER adopting 14 Report and Recommendation. It is the judgment of the Court the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without Respondent having to file an answer or return. To the extent Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability from this Court, that certificate is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/19/18. (kmca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Saleem Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?