Jessup v. Barnes Group Inc
Jeffrey A Jessup |
Barnes Group Inc |
6:2018cv02703 |
October 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Henry M Herlong |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 12/7/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/27/2018, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/29/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/26/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/26/2019, Discovery due by 7/26/2019, Motions due by 9/20/2019, Mediation Due by 8/23/2019. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 8 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/30/2018. (gpre, ) |
Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Barnes Group Inc. (Bright, Thomas) Modified on 11/29/2018 to remove attached proposed order with judge's signature(gpre, ). |
Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 11/20/2018, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 12/4/2018, Rule 26 Report due by 12/4/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/27/2018, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/28/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/27/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/27/2019, Discovery due by 4/29/2019, Motions due by 6/28/2019, Mediation Due by 5/29/2019. This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 10/30/2018. (gpre, ) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jeffrey A Jessup.(Arnold, W) |
Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Barnes Group Inc.(Bright, Thomas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers are due within fourteen days. (gpre, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Barnes Group Inc.(gpre, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-cp-23-4237. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8036341), filed by Barnes Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Notice of Filing)(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jessup v. Barnes Group Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey A Jessup | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Randall Summerlin |
Represented By: | W Andrew Arnold |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Barnes Group Inc | |
Represented By: | Thomas Allen Bright |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.